Welcome to Fully Baked, our Sunday newsletter where we validate one of our previous ideas as often as Sam Altman and Elon Musk beef on X 👀

In today's edition:

  • 💡 An idea we first served up 600+ editions ago

  • 🔬 We validated this idea - here's what we found

  • 🚀 The go-to-market playbook for this product

  • 🤑 What do the unit economics look like?

  • ⚔️ How the competitive landscape looks

  • ❓ Our verdict: is this a go or no-go idea

Let's goooo 🚀

P.S. On July 14, Zapier’s Chief People and AI Transformation Officer is running a free session on getting your team to actually use the agents you’ve built. More below, or save your seat here.

🚴 Angel Investing in Athletes

Sweat Equity

👤 Source: Business Ideas #29 (if you've been reading since then, you're a real one)

Problem:

  • The payoff at the top is genuinely absurd. Ronaldo alone pulled in an estimated $300m over the last 12 months, $235m of that just from his Al-Nassr salary. The average NBA player, someone you've never heard of, still clears $9.7m a season. The lottery ticket is real.

  • The problem is nobody can afford to buy the ticket early. A single year chasing a PGA Tour card on the mini-tours costs a minimum of $25,000 in entry fees and travel alone, and PGA Tour pros are budgeting $125,000+ a season just to stay on tour. Most young athletes are funded by parents remortgaging the house, not spreadsheets. You can bet on an athlete's next game, but you can't back their next decade.

  • So the idea: let fans front that capital instead, in exchange for a cut of the athlete's future earnings.

Solution:

  • A platform where fans angel invest directly in athletes early in their careers, in exchange for a percentage of their future earnings.

  • Athletes list their stats and career goals. Backers commit capital, similar to a seed round, in exchange for the right to a share of that athlete's earnings each year they're active.

  • It's structured like a venture portfolio: most athletes return nothing, a small few return enormous multiples, and diversification across many athletes smooths that out. The platform could also bundle athletes into sport-specific indices for fans who want exposure without picking a single name.

🧑‍💻 Prototyping: Google AI Studio demo | Remix this build

🤖 Sold on Agents, Stuck on Where to Start?

Most founders know they should be putting agents to work. Far fewer know which job to hand over first, and a bad first pick can kill the whole effort.

On July 14, Zapier's Chief People and AI Transformation Officer Brandon Sammut shows founders where to begin: the first workflow worth automating, how to spot the tasks agents handle well, and where a human still has to stay in the loop. Free, online.

🔬 Our Validation Process

🖥️ Desktop Research

  • Smart money keeps funding this thesis. At least six platforms are live in the space right now: Moonshot (YC S22, covering tennis, golf, basketball, football and motorsports), FANtium (tennis, $2m seed), Commonwealth (tennis, golf, horse racing), Finlete (baseball), Slice Token (golf, tennis) and Big League Advance (baseball, institutional). The regulatory path is proven too, with multiple SEC-approved offerings already through the door.

  • So we went looking at how the raises actually went. Big League Advance, the institutional version of this exact model, is raising its third fund with a $250m target and had $41.6m in assets as of March 2024. Vestible's NFL player offering closed near the low end of its range at $653,000, and the company hasn't run a second athlete deal since.

  • On the retail side: NBA player P.J. Washington ran a direct-to-fan offering seeking $1m, and subscriptions topped out at $12,700. FANtium's first tennis athlete raised $52k from fans - a genuine proof of concept, and the strongest retail number we found.

📋 Survey (180 responses via Prolific, screened for sports fans 21+ who bet on sports or play fantasy, ~$400 total)

  • The interest is in the players they know, not the prospects they don't. 68% said they'd rather put $100 on a bet or prediction market involving a player they already follow than invest it in a portfolio of unknown prospects. Familiarity is key here.

🚀 Acquiring Customers

👥 Early Users

  • Supply first: recruit ex-pros, scouts and prospect analysts as the faces of early raises. AngelList launched with famous angels, not investors, and each credible name brings their own audience with them.

  • Partner with one academy or mini-tour for the first athlete cohort. One official partnership does more for trust than any ad spend when you're asking for a decade-long commitment.

📈 Scaling Acquisition

  • The repeatable channel is athlete-led: each signed athlete markets their own raise to their own following, the same playbook FANtium used to hit $52k. Every raise doubles as a content event for sports media.

  • The thing to watch: five other platforms are fishing that same pond, and the channel that scales past "one athlete's personal following" into a self-sustaining marketplace hasn't been found yet. Whoever finds it wins the category.

🤑 The Economics of This Business

🏷️ Pricing

  • Athlete take rate: athletes give up 10-30% of earnings for a set number of years, tapering as they hit milestones - roughly the structure Slice Token already runs on tour prize money.

  • Platform fee: a 2% management fee on funds under management, plus a cut of the upside, mirroring a VC carry structure.

🧮 Unit Economics

⚔️ The Competitive Landscape

🏷️ Primary Competitors

  • Moonshot (YC S22): fan angel investing across five sports, launched with a 250-person backer waitlist in 2022. Lesson: getting category attention is easy. Turning a waitlist into a functioning market is the hard part.

  • FANtium: tokenises tennis players' prize money, raised a $2m seed. Lesson: crypto rails (wallets, KYC, secondary marketplaces) add friction on top of a demand question that hasn't been answered yet.

  • Big League Advance: the institutional-capital version, still short of its latest fund target. Lesson: watch what the professional money does - it's a stronger signal than any fan survey.

🎯 The Gap

  • There’s no obvious gap in the market, just a lot of companies trying to achieve the same outcome. No one’s cracked it yet though…

No-Go

The pain is real on both ends, but it's not an undiscovered wedge, it's a well-populated market. Seven funded platforms have run this exact play since 2019 without a single retail-fan success story, and even Big League Advance can't hit its fund target with sophisticated LPs.

Our survey data explains why - fans preferred betting on players they know over investing in prospects they don't.

The lesson: fans' money follows emotion that settles this weekend, not spreadsheets that settle next decade. Whoever cracks fan-funded athletes will build something that feels like fandom, not like a fund. This is one we'd happily watch someone else take a big swing at.

👋 That’s All Folks

Before you go, just a few public service announcements:

  • Have an idea you want feedback on? DM me to discuss it or book in for Office Hours here.

  • Looking to sponsor Half Baked? Just fill out this form and we’ll get back to you asap.

See you soon,

Darragh, John, George, Connell & Dan | The Half Baked Team

Reply

Avatar

or to participate